Skip to content

Research highlight: Pelvic fragment from the Lesedi Chamber

A new paper from our team led by Zachary Cofran looks at the immature ilium that is currently the most complete pelvic fragment of Homo naledi.

2 min read
Research highlight: Pelvic fragment from the Lesedi Chamber
U.W. 102a-138 ilium reconstructed with markers indicating semilandmarks and contours. From Cofran et al. 2022

Citation: Cofran, Zachary, Caroline VanSickle, Reynaldo Valenzuela, Daniel García-Martínez, Christopher S. Walker, John Hawks, Bernhard Zipfel, Scott A. Williams, and Lee R. Berger. The immature Homo naledi ilium from the Lesedi Chamber, Rising Star Cave, South Africa. American Journal of Biological Anthropology

Homo naledi has a very large fossil sample from the Dinaledi Chamber, including more than 40 fossils representing the pelvis. However, those fossils are very highly fragmented and come from several different individuals of different ages. That means our knowledge of the pelvic anatomy of H. naledi is incomplete.

The Lesedi Chamber is best known for the Neo skeleton, which is the most complete single individual of H. naledi that our team has reported so far. But there are also remains of at least two other individuals from this chamber. One of the hominin fossils that cannot belong to the Neo skeleton is an immature partial ilium, U.W. 102a-138. In this paper, led by Zach Cofran from Vassar College, our team examines this pelvic fragment to assess its age and consider what it can tell us about H. naledi and its locomotion.

Based on our comparisons, this ilium represents an individual likely between 4 and 11 years of age, in human standards. The size and developmental stage of the ilium is similar to two juvenile ilia from Makapansgat, MLD 7 and MLD 25, both attributed to Australopithecus africanus. Broadly, the anatomy of the Lesedi ilium is similar to these Au. africanus fossils. In particular, the shape of the iliac blade is more like MLD 7 than it is like the ilia of living human children across this range of ages.

Three ilium comparisons
Lesedi ilium compared to average of human sample (left), MLD 7 (center), and MLD 7 compared to human sample (right.

There is one main difference between the H. naledi and Au. africanus ilia, and that is the relatively large sacroiliac joint area in H. naledi. This is a humanlike feature of the pelvis in H. naledi, and the Lesedi fossil confirms this morphology in the most complete ilium we have found so far. What it means is less clear, and right now Erica Noble, a PhD student in my lab, is investigating the question further with comparisons of human and great ape ilium morphology.

Homo nalediRising Star cave systemanatomyResearch by John Hawks
John Hawks

John Hawks Twitter

I'm a paleoanthropologist exploring the world of ancient humans and our fossil relatives.

Related Posts

Members Public

Research highlight: Growth and development in human origins

A report from a Wenner-Gren-supported workshop innovating ways forward for understanding hominin ontogenies

A reconstruction of a Homo naledi child skull with bone and teeth indicated.
Members Public

Research highlight: Homo naledi teeth

In a massive new paper, a team led by Lucas Delezene provides descriptions of the dental evidence from the Dinaledi Chamber.

Four third mandibular premolars in five orientations with labels and scale bar
Members Public

Lecture: Finding ancient minds in the human evolutionary tree

Insights into the behavioral capabilities of ancient human relatives are beginning to show that some of the abilities we consider human go surprisingly deep in our ancestry.

Diagrams of eighteen hominin skulls against a black background