john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

bipedality

  • The pelvis of Australopithecus

    Sun, 2012-09-02 23:29 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Early hominins had a pelvic form adapted to bipedality
    The hominid pelvis is much shorter than ape pelves, with muscle attachments reoriented for effective walking.

    The most dramatic evolutionary change underlying human bipedality is the change in shape of the pelvis. The pelvis is rarely preserved as a fossil, but several partial pelves are available from australopithecines, including the "Lucy" skeleton and several partial pelves from later South African sites. The pelvis consists of three bones — the sacrum, which lies at the bottom of the spine and is composed of several fused vertebra-like elements, and the two os coxae, or hip bones. In early hominids, both the sacrum and hip bones are relatively short compared to apes. The upper portion of each hip bone, called the ilium, is short and curved compared to the long, flattened ilium of chimpanzees and other apes. The curvature places the attachment of the quadriceps muscle closer to the front of the body, allowing the muscle greater leverage in pulling the femur forward in an upright posture.

    Lucy (AL 288-1) skeleton

    Lucy (AL 288-1) skeleton.

    Although the ilia of Australopithecus were short from top to bottom compared to a chimpanzee, they extend more broadly to the side, resulting in a pelvis that is very broad overall. Lucy’s pelvic width was within the range of today’s women, despite her very small body size. As a result, her body was differently shaped from recent people — very broad for its short height.

    The width of the pelvis affects the muscular requirements of walking. Whenever one leg supports the body, gravity tends to tilt the upper body away from the supporting leg. The muscles on the opposite side must counteract this force to prevent the body from falling over. These muscles attach to the lateral part of the ilium and to the femur, pulling the trunk upward around the hip joint. A wide ilium tends to make these muscles more effective, by positioning the point of force further from the joint. A long femur neck also helps, just as long handles on a pair of scissors greatly increase the force with which they can cut. The configuration of these muscles in australopithecines is more extreme than the condition found in living people.

    A wide pelvis and long femur neck may have helped australopithecines to maintain a long stride with short legs. Two things add up to determine the length of a step: how much the leg swings, and how much the pelvis rotates. A wider pelvis rotates farther and thereby increases the length of a step. Another explanation is that widely spaced legs may allow a greater mechanical advantage for the muscles that draw the legs toward the midline. This configuration might help the style of climbing that requires the legs to clamp around a branch or trunk. This kind of climbing would be more necessary to bipeds who lacked the prehensile feet of living apes.

    Study questions: 
    1. Take a moment to walk around. Can you feel which muscles are active as you take a step?
    2. Could you imagine a different way to alter the mechanics of an ape pelvis to make it more effective for bipedality?
  • Bipedality and the pelvis

    Mon, 2011-10-31 23:02 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Laboratory exercise introducing the features of the pelvis related to bipedality in hominins.

    Humans are bipeds. The pelvis in humans has undergone radical changes in orientation and shape compared to other anthropoid primates. Many of these changes serve to adapt our muscle orientations to the requirements of upright stance and bipedal locomotion.

    The most significant changes to the pelvis in humans compared to other apes are:

    Ilium
    The ilium (top portion of the innominate bone) in humans is shorter and broader. It curves around the trunk, whereas in apes it is flat against the back of the trunk.
    Greater sciatic notch
    This is very wide in apes, a function of their long, tall ilium. In humans, the notch is actually a notch.
    Anterior inferior iliac spine
    This feature is prominent in the hominin pelvis, absent or small in apes.
    Sacrum
    In humans, the sacrum is broad and short, in apes it is narrow and long, usually incorporating 6 or more sacral vertebral bodies.

    What to do: This station has four pelvic bones from the species Australopithecus africanus, which existed around 2.6 million years ago in South Africa. Assess the anatomy of these bones in comparison to humans, chimpanzees and gorillas. Are these the pelvic bones of a biped? What features point to your conclusion?

    In addition, the plaques at the front of the room have the near-complete skeleton of a fossil species, Oreopithecus bambolii, found in Tuscany and Sardinia around 8 million years ago. Look carefully at the pelvis of this skeleton. Does it resemble the living apes or humans? Does it look like Australopithecus?

  • Laboratory: Feet

    Sun, 2011-09-04 23:17 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    Collection of laboratory exercises centered around bipedality and the hindlimb.

    The stations in this lab will introduce one of the best-known species of fossil hominins, evidence of bipedal locomotion early in our evolution, some basic anthropometric measurements, and the anatomy of the femur.

    Walking upright is a basic feature of humanity, which sets our family apart from other primates. Our way of walking is supported by many changes in our skeletons, especially the legs and feet. Some features are such distinctive evidence of bipedality that finding only a fragment of a fossil bone that preserves them is enough to show the fossil is one of our relatives.

    Goals

    1. Measure your own stature along with some other dimensions of your body. This is a graded exercise.
    2. Learn the basic anatomy of the femur and practice determining right versus left femora.
    3. Create and examine footprints, comparing them with casts of the Laetoli hominin footprints.
    4. Encounter casts of the skeletal remains of Australopithecus boisei.
  • The Laetoli footprints

    Fri, 2011-09-02 00:53 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    A lab exercise in making footprints to compare to the Laetoli G footprint track.

    The most striking piece of evidence for bipedality in our earliest hominin relatives is a series of footprint trails at Laetoli, a fossil-bearing site in Tanzania. The longest trail, known as trail G, was made by at least two individuals, one much larger than the other. These individuals were probably members of a species called Australopithecus afarensis, with fossil remains that have been found in other parts of the Laetoli area from nearly the same time, 3.5 million years ago. This species lived long before any that scientists call humans, they are different from us in many, many respects. But the evidence shows that they walked bipedally in a very humanlike way.

    Studying these footprints poses many challenges to scientists. Their shape should give us clues about the shape of the feet, the way they struck the ground, the length and pattern of steps. Probably the most obvious aspect of these footprints are the big toes, which were aligned more or less with the other toes. This is a very different shape than a chimpanzee or gorilla foot, in which the big toe is relatively short and diverges from the foot, and the other toes are long and curving. Nevertheless, the toes of A. afarensis were not quite the same as ours, as you can compare as you make your own footprints.

    A comparison of one of the Laetoli footprints (bottom) with a footprint from a later site attributed two modern humans (top and middle). The human (middle) is walking with a bent-knee, bent-hip (BKBH) gait, not a normal gait for a person. The image shows the depth of different parts of the print. From a research paper by David Raichlen and colleagues [1].

    This lab station has you making footprints, to see how you might study the shape and conditions under which the Laetoli footprints were made. As you make footprints, try to use different styles of gait. Move fast or slow, maybe try to simulate a running step. Can you rule out some patterns of movement for the makers of the Laetoli footprint trail?


    References

    Study questions: 
    1. What kind of locomotion can you imagine would be intermediate between human-like bipedality and ape-like quadrupedality?
    2. One of the main points of contention about the Laetoli footprints is whether they preserve human-like arches in the midfoot. What do your comparisons indicate?
Subscribe to bipedality

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.