john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

coevolution

  • Chimpanzee microbiome variation is like ours

    Tue, 2012-11-13 23:55 -- John Hawks

    A new paper by Andrew Moeller and colleagues surveys the variation in species composition of gut microbiomes in the chimpanzees from Gombe, Tanzania [1]. They found that chimpanzees have a very similar pattern of variation to that found in human populations. Here's their mini-review of the human variation in "enterotypes":

    The gut microbial communities in contemporary populations of humans have been partitioned into three clusters, termed ‘enterotypes’, each of which is characterized by a distinct set of overrepresented bacterial genera. Whereas initially no relationship was detected between enterotypes and specific features of the host (such as age, health status, body morphotype, provenance or gender), recent work has revealed associations between enterotype and long-term diet: the Bacteroides-dominant enterotype is prevalent in individuals whose diets are high in animal fat and protein, whereas the Prevotella-dominant enterotype prevails in individuals with high-carbohydrate diets.

    A microbiome is a multispecies community, in which each kind of bacteria has its own distinctive metabolic role. The entire bacterial is made up of different proportions of each bacterial genus. The "enterotypes" discussed here are defined by variation in the proportions of different bacterial genera.

    A visual depiction from the paper helps to show the three enterotypes in humans and chimpanzees. Each is characterized in a principal components plot, which reduces the proportions of dozens of bacterial types into two dimensions. This reduction is possible because the bacterial communities have covariance among species abundances -- when Dialister is common for example, Ruminococcus also tends to be common. The consistent association of some of the bacterial genera suggests that the community as a whole is regulated by the host gut and immune system factors.

    Bacterial enterotypes, after Moeller et al 2012

    Figure 1 from Moeller et al. 2012. Original caption: "(a) Assortment of gut microbial communities into enterotypes in chimpanzees and humans. Shown are BCA visualizations of enterotypes (coloured ellipses), as identified by PAM clustering, with black dots representing abundance distributions of bacterial genera from an individual host and numbered white rectangles marking the centre of each enterotype. Panel (right) showing human gut enterotypes modifed from Arumugam et al.1 Bacterial taxa uniquely overrepresented in the corresponding chimpanzee and human enterotypes are listed. (b) Relative abundances of the three bacterial taxa that are principally responsible for the separation of chimpanzee enterotypes. Shown are means, ranges and first and third quartiles. Colour coding of enterotypes follows that in (a)."

    The chimpanzees have the same associations among bacterial species as humans, which suggests that the ecology within the chimpanzee gut is regulated by similar factors. The paper makes it clear that the bacterial communities of chimpanzees and humans, despite the consistent similarity of enterotypes, do differ in many ways. There are some bacterial species that are common in chimpanzees that are rare in humans, or that are overrepresented in one chimpanzee enterotype without being similarly represented in the human equivalent. The paper does not provide evidence that the chimpanzee and human microbiomes have remained static from our common ancestors. Instead, it shows that there may be ecological factors or feedbacks that keep the variability within a trimodal dynamic.

    Another interesting aspect of the paper is that the bacterial enterotypes of chimpanzees are not stable within individuals. The authors examined the microbiomes in 2000, 2001, and 2008, finding that every individual changed from one enterotype to another during that period of time. The Gombe community did not change in a directional way, and no obvious factors explain the changes in enterotypes for individuals:

    As observed in humans, there is no obvious association between chimpanzee enterotype and host genetics or geography. When sampled in 2000, the siblings, Sandi and Shelton, and their mother, Sparrow, each possessed different enterotypes, and their enterotypes changed, and still differed, in later samplings. Meanwhile, three chimpanzees that are not all members of the same family or same geographic community (Darbee, Gremlin and Kris) harboured the same enterotypes at each of the three time points sampled. In humans, diet is likely to be a major contributor to a host’s enterotype2. As the availability of different foodstuffs in Gombe can fluctuate seasonally15, 16, diet may also influence the possession of certain chimpanzee enterotypes. However, we found no consistent association between enterotype and the season in which a host was sampled. Furthermore, all three enterotypes were present during each wet season when foods were abundant and the diets among the chimpanzee hosts were the most homogenous.

    All in all, I think this is a really fascinating study. The microbiome reveals something previously hidden, which may be important to dietary adaptations or immunity in hominoids generally. We might naturally assume that human microbiomes are products of very recent dietary innovations and rapid bacterial adaptation -- particularly among human agriculturalists. The chimpanzees may be showing that the important dynamics are much older than agriculture.


    References

    Synopsis: 
    A higher-order comparison of the gut bacterial community shows that some aspects of human variation may be ancient
  • Louse story

    Sun, 2010-05-02 18:53 -- John Hawks

    Bruce Bower reports on Andrew Kitchen and colleagues' work, establishing the divergence time of human head lice and body lice. The idea is that this divergence must have happened after the time when people started habitually wearing clothing.

    An earlier analysis of mitochondrial DNA from the two modern types of lice indicated that body lice evolved from head lice only about 70,000 years ago. Because body lice thrive in the folds of clothing, they likely appeared not long after clothes were invented, many scientists believe.

    Though well suited to gauging the timing of evolutionary events, mitochondrial DNA is a relatively small part of the genome. Kitchen’s team examined both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA samples from head and body lice, yielding the much older, and presumably more accurate, estimate of when body lice first evolved.

    I'll be interested to see this research when it is published. It's a clever idea, but I've not yet been convinced that clothing is really the relevant ecological factor. Many tropical people have never worn clothes, more than a little strip around the waist. I wonder whether the reduction of body hair may have been more important, and if so, how long it took for the emergence and dispersal of a new louse species through the human population.

    Plus, it's sort of hard to believe people lived in Europe and northern China in the early Middle Pleistocene without any kind of clothing. Unless they had fur.

  • Another side of pitcher plants

    Sun, 2010-03-14 08:30 -- John Hawks

    Jerry Coyne writes about a paper that demonstrates a strange adaptation of certain Bornean pitcher plants: "Good to the last dropping: pitcher plant evolves to be shrew loo"

    Working on Mount Kinabalu in Borneo, Lee et al. discovered that three species of pitcher plants in the genus Nepenthes (N. lowii, N. macrophylla, and the N. rajah, the world’s largest carnivorous plant, shown in Fig. 2), have evolved features that make them attractive to treeshrews of the genus Tupaia. (Treeshrews are neither rodents nor shrews; they’re a group more closely related to primates than to rodents). The plants have recurved “lids” that produce a sweet substance that the tree shews lap up while sitting astride the pitchers.

    The authors found that, depending on the species of plant, between 60% and 90% of the pitchers contained fecal pellets from treeshrews. Video cameras placed near pitchers of N. rajah captured 7 treeshrew visits, lasting an average of 24 seconds, and one of these showed the beast crapping into the pitcher. Previous analysis (Clarke et al. 2009) showed that these pellets provide a large fraction (58-90%) of the nitrogen needed by N lowii.

    I find it fascinating that there have been enough tree shrews to make this scheme work for the pitcher plants. I suppose urine, which is less visible, would also supply nitrogen just as effectively.

Subscribe to coevolution

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.