john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

Taung

  • Einstein and Taung: two brains collide

    Wed, 2012-11-21 13:03 -- John Hawks

    Dean Falk has a new article in the journal Brain, in which she and collaborators uncover the details within historical photographs of Albert Einstein's brain [1]. The brain was sectioned after Einstein's death and samples have been studied by several researchers over the years, including Falk. The research was recently covered by the TV program NOVA ScienceNOW, which is being rebroadcast this week.

    I wanted to point to the article by Falk and colleagues because it includes a brief discussion of the lunate sulcus -- one of the most persistently pernicious topics in paleoneurology.

    The terminology for sulci of the human occipital lobe, in particular, has been influenced by an erroneous historical claim that human brains manifest a so-called lunate sulcus that is homologous to the Affenspalte (‘ape sulcus’) that forms the rostral boundary of the primary visual cortex [Brodmann area (BA) 17] on the lateral surface of the brain in apes and some monkeys (Smith, 1904, 1925). However, BA 17 of humans may, or may not, extend onto the external surface of the occipital lobe. When it does, its rostral border is located far posterior to the normal position for ape brains and is rarely bordered by a sulcus (Allen et al., 2006). Despite the fact that recent gross morphological and cytoarchitectural studies refute the assertion that humans have a lunate sulcus that is homologous with the Affenspalte (Allen et al., 2006; see Falk, 2012 for a discussion of the evolutionary implications), contemporary authors continue to use a variety of criteria to identify different sulci as so-called lunate sulci in humans (Duvernoy et al., 1999; Iaria and Petrides, 2007). The classical terminology used by Connolly (1950) for the occipital lobe is also grounded on the mistaken notion that humans have lunate sulci that are homologous to those of apes. For example, Connolly (1950) identifies a prelunate sulcus, which we identify with its modern name of the lateral occipital sulcus (Table 1). For these reasons, we do not recognize a lunate sulcus in Einstein’s brain.

    The long-running argument over the possible location of the lunate sulcus in the endocast of the Taung fossil hominin was a heated debate for more than 20 years in paleoanthropology. For Falk, the end of the story is that the sulcal patterns in human and other primate brains in this region are not homologous -- making it problematic to recognize either in the fossil endocasts of early hominins. I'm sure it isn't over, but I find it inspiring to see the evolutionary record make an appearance in this consideration of the brain of a very famous scientist.


    References

  • A Taung tour

    Fri, 2012-06-29 10:32 -- John Hawks

    The South African Palaeocave Survey has a new post reporting on a visit to the Taung site:

    We visited the Taung limeworks near the town of Buxton in the North West province. The site, which was designated a National Heritage Site in 2002 (see plaque photo), is quite large and was an active mine during the 1920s. It was later systematically excavated by paleoanthropologists from the University of California in the 1940s, and from the University of Witswatersrand between 1988 and 1992. Both the mining and excavations resulted in extensive dumps that surround the area of the site from which the skull is thought to derive. However, the exact location at which the skull was found can only be approximately reconstructed from mine records and historical documents – after all, it was only recognized after it arrived in Johannesburg in a wooden crate!

    A couple of weeks ago, the project posted about a trip to "Wonderwerk Cave". This is an interesting blog to follow this summer.

  • Taung

    Tue, 2011-10-25 00:38 -- John Hawks
    Synopsis: 
    A lab station introducing the Taung specimen and considering its age.

    The face, mandible and endocast from Taung, South Africa, was the first australopithecine fossil to be discovered. We now know that the fossil dates to the period between 2.5 and 3.0 million years ago, but at the time of its discovery, the precise date was not known; only that it was likely earlier than fossil evidence for human evolution outside Africa.

    The morphology of the specimen was therefore the strongest evidence about its relationships to humans and living apes. Interpreting the morphology means coming to terms with the developmental age of the skull.

    Assess the age and morphology of the individual:

    1. What dental age would you assign to Taung, based on your knowledge of human dental development?
    2. What differences are there between Taung and the chimpanzee?
    3. Imagine that Taung was the only australopithecine specimen ever discovered, as it once was. How would you support the argument that it was a hominid?
    Study terms: 
  • Naming your fictional species

    Mon, 2011-02-14 00:53 -- John Hawks

    How very strange. I was doing a routine Google lookup for "Taung" tonight, and I discovered that the top hit has nothing to do with the Taung fossil specimen or site at all. No, it's from Wookiepedia, the Star Wars wiki. It seems that some author within the Star Wars fantasy universe created a race of creatures called the "Taungs":

    The Taungs, later known as the Mandalorians,[1] were a warlike Near-Human species that dominated the planet Coruscant thousands of years before the rise of Humans.

    I hadn't really thought about the obvious possibility that the names of paleontological sites often fulfill the desiderata of science fiction names -- vaguely foreign-sounding, associated with a definite historical connotation.

  • Quote: Popular Science on Taung (1924)

    Sat, 2010-03-06 07:30 -- John Hawks

    A reader passes along a link to the Popular Science archive, now available free.

    So naturally, I searched immediately for "Australopithecus". And in the April 1925 issue, they covered Raymond Dart's discovery at Taung. The short article appears on the same page as a picture of an early tanning bed (complete with topless woman) and a rather short Javan man standing next to a rather tall Titan arum flower. Here's one of the five paragraphs:

    The difference between men and animals is associated with the size of certain parts of the brain. The Pithecanthropus, the oldest man known, from the shape of a skull found, is judged to have been a creature who could speak. Judging again from the shape of its skull, Professor Dart says that the newly discovered manlike ape could not yet speak, but had a brain much more developed than that of an ape. That is, the brain was enlarged in those parts associated with human characteristics.

    Isn't it remarkable how much more information articles about human evolution pack in today?

    Hmmm...why did I never get into Popular Science when I was a kid? Here's a clue: after 1925, "Australopithecus" doesn't appear in the archive again until 1993!

Subscribe to Taung

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.