john hawks weblog

paleoanthropology, genetics and evolution

island biogeography

  • Crete: Pleistocene port of call?

    Sat, 2010-01-09 09:42 -- John Hawks

    Bruce Bower reports on excavations by Thomas Strasser on the Mediterranean island of Crete: "Ancient hominids may have been seafarers".

    At Preveli Gorge, Stone Age artifacts were excavated from four terraces along a rocky outcrop that overlooks the Mediterranean Sea. Tectonic activity has pushed older sediment above younger sediment on Crete, so 130,000-year-old artifacts emerged from the uppermost terrace. Other terraces received age estimates of 110,000 years, 80,000 years and 45,000 years.

    These minimum age estimates relied on comparisons of artifact-bearing sediment to sediment from sea cores with known ages. Geologists are now assessing whether absolute dating techniques can be applied to Crete’s Stone Age sites, Strasser says.

    I would set a high bar for evidence on this one. No details are available; it was a conference presentation.

    One possibility: According to Alexandra van der Geer and colleagues (2006), there was a faunal turnover on Crete 300,000 years ago. The earlier fauna included a 1.5-meter dwarf mammoth and dwarf hippos. The hippos were hoof-walkers apparently adapted to a "more terrestrial" activity pattern. Sometime after 400,000 years ago, this fauna was replaced. No more hippos or mammoths, and new, larger, mainland-derived elephants. As they wrote (125):

    The dwarf elephant may be large compared to the mammoth of the previous period, but it is still about 30% smaller than its mainland ancestor E. antiquus, which has a shoulder heigth of 3.7 m. The dwarf elephant has strongly curved tusks. It is still a matter of debate why this elephant did not reach a pygmy size.

    The arrival of humans is one possibility. Sondaar and van der Geer (2002) suggested that Sardinia-Corsica might have undergone similar turnovers induced by human arrivals during the Middle and Late Pleistocene.

    But that's entirely speculation. I want to see some dating and good descriptions of the artifacts and their context.

    If the artifacts found by Strasser represent a genuine occupation, the Cretans would presumably have been seafaring Neandertals. Or Preneandertal-derived hobbits. Man, I wish I'd made that one of the 2010 predictions!

    References:

    van der Geer A, Dermitzakis M, de Vos J. 2006. Crete before the Cretans: The reign of dwarfs. Pharos: Journal of the Netherlands Institute in Athens 13:119-130.

    Sondaar PY, Van der Geer AAE 2002. Plio-Pleistocene terrestrial vertebrate faunal evolution on Mediterranean islands, compared to that of the Palearctic mainland. Annales Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1e Série 39, A: 165-180.

    Synopsis: 
    Stone artifacts on Crete may be Middle Paleolithic or earlier, putting Neandertals in boats. Maybe.
  • The bad side of island life

    Thu, 2009-06-04 19:30 -- John Hawks

    It's not news that island populations are vulnerable to invasion by alien competitors and predators. A new study by Helena Berglund and colleagues in American Naturalist reviews the literature on the topic and presents an analysis of the effects of invasive species on islands with different levels of endemicity (that is, proportions of species found only on the island).

    Here's a useful paragraph of context from the paper's introduction:

    Isolation from the nearest mainland appears to be one of the most consistent predictors of the number of extinctions of bird species on oceanic islands (Blackburn and Gaston 2005), and many cases of depauperate flora and fauna on remote and isolated islands are known (Elton 1958). Isolation and remoteness is a combination that also qualifies as a vulnerability predictor, for several reasons. First, islands are often small territories with small populations that historically have faced a higher risk of extinction than mainland territories (Manne et al. 1999; Trevino et al. 2007), and more isolated island communities are recolonized at a slower rate than the less isolated ones (Brown and Kodric‐Brown 1977). Second, less isolated and adjacent islands have a higher frequency of introductions of new species than more isolated and remote islands (MacArthur and Wilson 1963). If extinctions and replacements of native species follow from introductions of new ones, communities on less remote islands will face a higher risk of replacement of the most susceptible species, so that their communities become more resilient to new introductions in the future (i.e., extinction filters; Rodriguez 2001). The same reasoning may lend support to insularity as an explanation for the relative rarity of high‐impact invaders in marine as opposed to freshwater systems (Cox and Lima 2006).

    After the paper's analysis, there is substantial discussion of the relation of invasive species to human disturbance. For one thing, invasive species on islands tend to occupy different niches from the endemics they replace. The paper cites other work (Case 1996) suggesting that this is because the invaders are exploiting human-created habitats. Also, there is a positive relation between island area and proportion of threatened or extinct endemics. The authors observe that island biogeography predicts a negative relation between species number and island size, which might suggest greater ecosystem robustness on larger islands. But larger islands are "more intense" subjects of human resource extraction, which may enable a greater number of invasive species.

    On the subject of robustness to change:

    This interpretation of endemism in the light of isolation goes hand in hand with the application of the term “stability,” defined by Cronk (1997) as “the tendency of biota, their interactions and community processes to persist in a given geographical area for long periods of time” (p. 483). He used it to suggest that continents have high “robustness stability,” or short‐term stability to extrinsic change, whereas isolated islands tend to have high long‐term stability with relict species but lower short‐term stability to extrinsic change (Cronk 1997), such as the introduction of NIS. The high vulnerability to NIS by species on isolated islands may also come from traits evolved in the absence of interactions with immigrants, for example, flightlessness in birds in the absence of predators (McNab 1994), exaggerated enemy release (Cronk 1997), and specialization (Wijesinghe and Brooke 2004). The vulnerability of endemic species may then arise from their geographically restricted distributions and isolation from many types of competitors, predators, and diseases.

    I tend to think that the evolution of small brains in the absence of continental human competitors probably qualifies.

    For my own notes, this is a useful reference-full sentence on the topic of rapid evolution:

    The present call for more attention to the long‐term modulating effects of invasive species is supported by evidence accumulated during the last decade for rapid adaptation to a recipient community in the invader species and selection for new traits and novel genotypes in native species in response to invaders (Mooney and Cleland 2001; Lambrinos 2004; Strauss et al. 2006; Strayer et al. 2006; Whitney and Gabler 2008).

    As concerns native species, these are examples of rapid environmental changes causing selection. For invader species, the ecological change is coupled with massive population growth. In that sense, humans are themselves an invasive population in many habitats.

    References:

    Berglund H, Järemo J, Bengtsson G. 2009. Endemism predicts intrinsic vulnerability to nonindigenous species on islands. Am Nat (in press) doi:10.1086/598501

  • Essay on the island rule

    Fri, 2008-11-07 23:47 -- John Hawks

    The web site for the Hobbit episode of Nova has opened. It let's you e-mail questions for Mike Morwood, features some graphics with endocast scans and some video from the program.

    The site also includes an essay by Peter Tyson on the history of the island rule, which is a nice article, even if you know a lot about island biogeography. Here's a quote from the conclusion

    Despite all the work in the three and a half decades since Foster first took an intellectual machete to the tangle of questions surrounding the gigantism/dwarfism question, much awaits illumination. As biologists James Brown and Mark Lomolino conclude in their classic textbook Biogeography, "the generality of the island rule and its corollaries ... remain promising areas for future studies."

    New studies might also help clear up certain evolutionary conundrums. No one knows, for instance, whether the Seychelles giant tortoise became humungous before or after it arrived in the archipelago. No one knows why island-dwelling bears show only a slight degree of dwarfism despite their bearish build and carnivorous habits. And no one knows why ducks tend toward dwarfism. Many birds in evolutionary history have become gigantic (and flightless)—the great auk, the ostrich, the elephant birds of Madagascar. Why has evolution never produced a giant flightless duck? "A question," muses [David] Quammen, "to lie awake over."

    It would be a good essay for distribution to classes -- a nice piece of work.

    UPDATE (2008-11-8): A reader reminds me of the Demon Duck of Doom. D'oh -- I should have remembered that one. He says, no sense lying awake at night over that one.

  • When disease strikes an island species

    Wed, 2008-11-05 14:41 -- John Hawks

    Jennifer Viegas writes an interesting story about a new study that shows the extinction of Christmas Island rats was driven by black rat diseases:

    Co-author Ross MacPhee, a curator of vertebrate zoology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, N.Y., explained that Charles Andrews of the British Museum documented at the time that black rats were first brought to the island via the S.S. Hindustan in 1899. The ship-jumping black rats then carried a protozoan known as Trypanosoma lewisi. A related organism causes sleeping sickness in humans.

    "Fleas are the intermediate host for one of the developmental stages of Trypanosoma, and the only likely method (of disease spread) is infected fleas crossing from black rats to endemic rats," MacPhee told Discovery News.

    After the Hindustan's arrival, the native island rats were observed staggering around deathly ill on footpaths. Shortly thereafter, they were never seen again.

    Credit must go to whoever wrote down their observation of "staggering" rats!

    The study found trypanosomes in post-contact rats but not pre-contact ones, and so concluded that they triggered the extinction. This is fairly weak; not all the postcontact rats had the trypanosomes in their analysis, and they fall back on an argument about critical numbers for species survival, etc. Personally, I would fall back on competition with the black rats.

    In that sense, there's little difference between the Christmas Island rats and, say, English red squirrels -- which are largely being annihilated by a disease brought by the American grays, but also face strong competition with the larger grays when their numbers decline.

    The point is, it's never good to compete with a species that brings their own pathogens along with them. Which humans learn repeatedly, both in history and in science fiction!

  • Weed species (part 1)

    Mon, 2008-07-07 20:26 -- John Hawks

    This is the first in a series of essays titled, "Practical Evolution." Here are links to the whole series and the series introduction. I've decided to break the articles up into two parts, so that a full essay will appear in two successive weeks. So if you enjoy the current installment, by all means come back on Friday, when I will follow the threads of dispersal by way of an obnoxious animal pest right back to hominids.

    Dandelion seeds

    Probably the most well-known weed species in America is the one growing so prolifically in my yard: the dandelion. Any kid can tell you why dandelions spread so quickly: Their seeds are carried by the wind.

    But for all their blowing of the puff-heads, as Goodwin calls them, my kids haven't noticed what seems so obvious to me. Dandelions are almost indestructible. Pull them up and their leaves will dry, but the flowers on the dead-looking plants continue to develop seeds and puff out. Leave just a little of the taproot in the ground, and new leaves will sprout hydra-like from all directions. Gretchen drenched a goodly portion of our sidewalk dandelions last year with boiling water, wilting the leaves like spinach. Some of them really died. The rest sprouted right back.

    Even when we're talking about dainty little parasol-like seeds, much depends on the size of the whole package. The part that looks like a "seed," a botanist calls an achene, which is technically a kind of fruit. The sunflower seeds that teenagers spit at softball games are fruits, too, but don't try telling that to their mothers. The dandelion's parachute, or pappus, is connected to the achene by one long shaft. A large, massive achene will tend to fall faster and won't blow very far except in a very strong wind. Sunflowers and coneflowers go for the big achene strategy, which the winter-resident birds really appreciate come January. Dandelions go the opposite way: small achene, big pappus. That's why weedy coneflowers are only a problem within five feet of my perennial beds, while weedy dandelions are in every disturbed field in the country.

    Barkley Sound, Broken Island group

    Barkley Sound, Broken Islands group

    A remarkable botanical field study has been carried out over the last twenty-seven years by Martin Cody, in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. In 1981, Cody began keeping track of the plants on a few of the small islands that dot the Sound. After a few years, the study had changed into something grander than a simple plant census: Cody's 2006 book on the subject begins, "This is a book about a field study that just grew and grew." For more than twenty years, Cody and his students have counted plants on hundreds of tiny islands, most under a few hundred square meters in size. Many of these islands are so small that a species may disappear from them entirely, only to be re-established later by new colonists. With his careful censuses, Cody could determine when populations were newly founded, and when they became locally extinct.

    By 1996, Cody had amassed information about weedy plants that had colonized dozens of the tiny islands of Barkley Sound. These plants all originally had come from Europe, including dandelions, their close relative cat's-ear (Hypochaeris radicata), wall lettuce (Mycelis (Lactuca) muralis), and woodland groundsel (Senecio sylvaticus). That means that all the plants are recent colonists, and they have all been carried to the islands by the wind, each using similar seed packages that include an achene and pappus.

    What makes a successful colonist? The first seeds to reach one of these tiny islands have done an exceptional thing: Wind has carried them across a large body of water to reach a tiny speck of virgin soil. Only the tiniest achenes tend to make this unlikely journey, and only if their parachutes are big enough to carry them.

    Cody and his student, Jacob Overton, took some of these seeds from both island and mainland populations and embarked on a series of experiments. First, they set a stopwatch and dropped the seeds to see how fast they fell. The results of this seed drop were pretty much the same as when kids tie little parachutes onto green army men. Generally, the bigger the parachute, the slower the descent. But if the achene is small enough, even a very small pappus may be enough to keep it aloft. The key is the ratio: the volume of the pappus compared to that of the achene.

    Wall lettuce seedhead

    Seed head of wall lettuce (Mycelis muralis) with five achenes remaining

    There's nothing very surprising about this: The wind carries small seeds farther, particularly if they have big parachutes. Plants that bear this kind of seed have only a tiny chance of colonizing an island. But plants with big achenes and little parachutes may have no chance of colonizing new islands at all. So by sorting seeds, the wind and sea also sort the genes of the colonizing plants.

    Indeed, Cody and Overton found that new populations of these plants on islands produce the kind of seeds that occasionally skip across to new islands. For example, the youngest island populations of wall lettuce — less than four years old — have the tiniest achenes. Their parachutes are small, too, but they generate a lot of loft. If the seeds of mainland wall lettuce are like a green army man tied to a kleenex, the first island colonists are like a BB stuck to a postage stamp.

    Wall lettuce populations that manage to stick around on an island make a change. After ten years, they are producing achenes just as big as the mainland populations. But instead of big, fluffy parachutes, they grow smaller, stunted ones. Like green army men tied to smaller and smaller postage stamps, these seeds aren't made for dispersal. They drop fast, right next door to their parents.

    More dispersal is not always better, even if you're a weed. A windy day might carry your seeds far away, but what if you live on a tiny island? Your seeds will be carried right off into the ocean. Worse, even if you live on a large island in Barkley Sound, there may be only a small strip of good habitat. Too far toward the water and you're drowned by storm surges; too far inland and you have to compete with larger, more established plants. For these island weeds, the plants that disperse the least have more new seedlings.

    Cat's-ear

    Cat's-ear

    Adaptable as they are, dandelions have done a poor job colonizing these tiny islands. The best of these weed species have managed to invade one island in five. Dandelions are found on less than a fourth that many. Despite their fame for being windblown, dandelion seeds actually drop faster than the wispy seeds of the other species on these islands. The rare colonists that do reach an island tend to last less than two years.

    Their relative, cat's-ear, has done better. Since it carries its flowers higher, on branched stems, cat's-ear makes more headway into grassy areas away from the beach, giving it a bit more area to work with. As a result, its populations become extinct only a third as much turnover as dandelions. LIke the wall lettuce, the island cat's-ear populations are different from the mainland, sporting big achenes and small parachutes. Dropping their seeds nearby seems to make a big difference as to whether their populations will persist.

    Natural selection seems to have changed the island populations of both these weeds, favoring lower dispersal. But how do we know it is really selection on dispersal, and not just something about the islands affecting seed size?

    Woodland groundsel, another of the weedy asters on the islands, provides one natural experiment. Cody and Overton dropped dozens of groundsel seeds from twenty populations, and found that the sizes of achenes and pappus made no difference at all to the speed that the seeds drop to the ground. Small groundsel achenes drop just as fast as large ones, no less than if Galileo had dropped them from the Leaning Tower. Even if selection had favored faster drop times, woodland groundsel achenes and pappus volumes should not have changed. And in fact, Cody and Overton found that they didn't change: island populations of woodland groundsel have proportions almost exactly the same as the mainland.

    Another experiment has been carried out in the most unlikely location. Hawksbeards (genus Crepis), also relatives of the dandelion, are common weeds spread across the Old World and into North America. Like dandelions, the hawksbeard Crepis sancta can colonize urban habitat, including the tiny patches of bare ground that cities leave in sidewalks for trees to grow. These are the urban equivalent of the tiny islands in Barkley Sound: sometimes far apart, they are separated by stretches of inhospitable concrete. In Montpelier, France, during the last few years Pierre-Olivier Cheptou and his colleagues have performed the urban version of Martin Cody's work: counting plants and collecting seeds from the small hawksbeard colonies around the city. What it lacks in rugged charm, Montpelier makes up in record-keeping — knowing when the sidewalks were built, the researchers could work out the ages of different hawksbeard populations.

    Unlike dandelions, C. sancta produces two different kinds of seeds: one with the achene and pappus carried on the wind, and another with no pappus at all. These seeds without parachutes do not go far; they scatter near the mother plant. That makes them bad for colonizing new patches of ground, but really good for establishing a sustained presence in one patch.

    Compared to the rural C. sancta population, urban plants have more of the no-parachute seeds. These plants cast fewer seeds to the wind, and drop more on the ground to sprout nearby. Like the islands of Barkley Sound, these urban islands select for low dispersal.

    Cheptou and his coworkers were able to go farther than Cody and Overton: They planted the seeds from urban patches in a greenhouse alongside seeds from the rural areas outside of town. The urban/rural differences were still present in the greenhouse plants, showing that growing in a small patch is not enough to change the seeds. Instead, the differences are caused by differences in genes, the result of selection on the urban plants.

    What is more, they grew their own small patches of C. sancta, replicating the conditions of the urban plants. The seed heads of the real urban populations were the equal of those after 12 to 13 generations of selection on their fake urban patches. This rapid pace of selection on the urban plants matches that on the islands of Barkley Sound, where wall lettuce and cat's-ear repeatedly showed strongest changes after only a few generations.

    Cody and Overton 1996, Figure 1

    The cycle of founding new island populations and their subsequent extinction.

    Colonization is a filter: Only certain individuals may have the right combination of traits to cross a significant barrier and inhabit a new place. But the traits that enable individuals to make such crossings are not always very good for staying in the new place.

    For certain species, selection yields a complicated pattern. A plant that is a local failure may be a global success, as it casts its seeds to far-off places, a few of which may grow into significant new populations. Such high-dispersing plants may do very poorly as a new population grows, but may be the only ones with a chance to escape when local extinction looms. High-dispersing individuals are also the ones most likely to carry their genes from one population to another, providing the potential for adaptations across the species as a whole.

    Without dispersal, a species may become moribund, unable to change in the face of new challenges. At the extreme, this has been called "evolutionary suicide." Traits that are selected locally, because they enhance the reproduction of individuals in the species, may nevertheless doom the species as a whole by reducing adaptability to changing conditions. The cost of maintaining the ability to change is a constant unstable balance between dispersal and staying power.

    For the weeds of Barkley Sound, this unstable balance ultimately favors the colonizers. New island populations do not last long. The local selection in favor of lower dispersal helps them to persist for a time, but on the scale of centuries all of them will fail, only to be replaced by new colonists from elsewhere.

    Friday: We turn from plant parachutes to animal dispersal mechanisms. And by "mechanisms" I mean, "legs."

    Notes:

    I am indebted to George Cox, whose excellent Alien Species and Evolution: The Evolutionary Ecology of Exotic Plants, Animals, Microbes, and Interacting Native Species (2004) gives a good account of Cody and Overton's study of island weeds. I can't say enough good things about this book.

    Martin Cody's book, Plants on Islands: Diversity And Dynamics on a Continental Archipelago, gives an account of the history of his field project, as well as reviews of the many areas of ecology that it has helped to illuminate.

    Many readers may notice that there is another factor besides low dispersal potential by which selection might favor large achenes in these plant species. Larger seeds may be advantageous because, with more stored energy, they may tend to germinate more readily or grow more quickly, thus making them more competitive. In this circumstance, selection would pertain to energy allocation or reproductive effort, rather than dispersal. I'll be discussing that form of selection in a later essay. In the present cases, dispersal is indicated as the target of selection, but seed size and energy allocation may also be involved.

    If seed morphology makes so little difference to drop time in Senecio sylvaticus, you may wonder what maintains achene size and pappus volume in this species. At least, that's what I wondered. Without more information it is hard to say, but I would hypothesize that achene and pappus volume may be genetically correlated in a way that is hard to select for one and not the other. In the other species, the selection on achene size and pappus volume is apparently antagonistic -- larger achenes are favored at the same time as smaller pappus. If these two traits are strongly genetically correlated, it becomes harder to select for lower dispersal. It would also be worth investigating whether other traits besides these volumes may have evolved in the island populations.

    The rapid evolution of urban hawksbeard (Crepis sancta) was examined by Cheptou et al. (2008). Pierre-Olivier Cheptou has a webpage at CEFE, including a description of Crepis sancta as a model system.

    Photo credits:

    Dandelion seeds: Photo by Piccolo Namek, on Wikimedia. GPL license.

    Barkley Sound: Photo by Sam Wilson (BaylorBear78) on Flickr. Creative commons noncommercial share-alike license.

    Cat's-ear: Photo by Ian Boyd, on Flickr. Creative Commons noncommercial attribution license.

    Wall lettuce: Photo by Mollivan John, on Flickr. Creative Commons noncommercial attribution license.

    Colonization figure: Figure 1 from Cody and Overton, 1996.

    References:

    Cheptou, P-O, Carrue O, Souifed S, Cantarel A. 2008. Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:3796-3799. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708446105

    Cody ML. 2006. Plants on Islands: Diversity and Dynamics on a Continental Archipelago. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Cody ML, Overton JM, 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations. J Ecol 84:53-61.

    Cox G. 2004. Alien Species and Evolution. Island Press, Washington.

Subscribe to island biogeography

Neandertals

For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.

Denisova

From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.

Acceleration

The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.

Malapa

Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.