Quote of the day
Writer Brian Alexander, on the future of sex:
We're at that 1939-World's-Fair moment in which there's just enough new technology out there to spark some creative thinking about the shape of boinking to come.


Writer Brian Alexander, on the future of sex:
We're at that 1939-World's-Fair moment in which there's just enough new technology out there to spark some creative thinking about the shape of boinking to come.
General Zod, from Superman II, on visiting the Fortress of Solitude:
Scruffy. So morbid. A sentimental replica of a planet long since vanished. No style at all!
Ronald M. Green, ethicist, on building the "Bride of Neanderthal":
"If we learn this is a species that was wrongly pushed off the stage of history, there is something of a moral argument for bringing it back," he said. "But the status quo is not without merit."
Metagenomics maven Eddy Rubin, on grinding up some more Neandertals, in Wired:
I need to get more bone ... I'll go to Russia with a pillowcase and an envelope full of euros and meet with guys who have big shoulder pads. Whatever it takes.
Darwin, in a letter to J. D. Hooker (Dec. 12, 1856):
It is really laughable to see what different ideas are prominent in various naturalists' minds, when they speak of 'species': in some, resemblance is everything and descent of little weight -- in some resemblance seems to go for nothing, and Creation the reigning idea -- in some descent is the key, -- in some, sterility an unfailing test, with others it is not worth a farthing. It all comes, I believe, from trying to define the undefinable.
Claude Shannon, in The Mathematical Theory of Communication (p. 56-57):
The redundancy of a language is related to the existence of crossword puzzles. If the redundancy is zero any sequence of letters is a reasonable text in the language and any two-dimensional array of letters forms a crossword puzzle. If the redundancy is too high the language imposes too many constraints for large crossword puzzles to be possible. A more detailed analysis shows that if we assume the constraints imposed by the language are of a rather chaotic and random nature, large crossword puzzles are just possible when the redundancy is 50%. If the redundancy is 33%, three-dimensional crossword puzzles should be possible, etc.
K. S. Lashley (Quarterly Review of Biology 24:28, 1949):
When Phungst (1911) demonstrated that the horses of Elberfeld, who were showing marvelous linguistic and mathematical ability, were merely reacting to movements of the trainer's head, Mr. Krall, (1912), their owner, met the criticism in the most direct manner. He asked the horses whether they could see such small movements and in answer they spelled out an emphatic "NO."
Jesper Hoffmeyer, in Signs of Meaning in the Universe (translated by Barbara Haveland):
When we became human beings, language ran its hyphae far into the nervous system allowing, today, no hope of excision -- not even in theory.
Karl Popper, in Unended Quest:
Never let yourself be goaded into taking seriously problems about words and their meanings. What must be taken seriously are questions of fact, and assertions about facts: theories and hypotheses; the problems they solve and the problems they raise.
Ann Althouse, on spouting off about topics outside one's expertise:
There are many problems that, for me, provoke only this thought: If it were my job to solve this problem, I would work on it, and, in this process working on it, anything I have to say about it now would be something I wouldn't waste my time on.