|Title||Archaeology as a social science.|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2012|
|Authors||Smith, ME, Feinman, GM, Drennan, RD, Earle, T, Morris, I|
|Journal||Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|
|Date Published||2012 Apr 30|
|Keywords||archaeology, history of archaeology, metascience, social science|
Because of advances in methods and theory, archaeology now addresses issues central to debates in the social sciences in a far more sophisticated manner than ever before. Coupled with methodological innovations, multiscalar archaeological studies around the world have produced a wealth of new data that provide a unique perspective on long-term changes in human societies, as they document variation in human behavior and institutions before the modern era. We illustrate these points with three examples: changes in human settlements, the roles of markets and states in deep history, and changes in standards of living. Alternative pathways toward complexity suggest how common processes may operate under contrasting ecologies, populations, and economic integration.
Archaeology as a social science.
For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.
From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.
The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.