| Title | A comparison of the human and chimpanzee olfactory receptor gene repertoires. |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2005 |
| Authors | Gilad, Y, Man, O, Glusman, G |
| Journal | Genome research |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pagination | 224-30 |
| Date Published | 2005 Feb |
| ISSN | 1088-9051 |
| Keywords | chimpanzees, olfaction, pseudogenes, receptors |
| Abstract | Olfactory receptor (OR) genes constitute the basis of the sense of smell and are encoded by the largest mammalian gene superfamily, with >1000 members. In humans, but not in mice or dogs, the majority of OR genes have become pseudogenes, suggesting that OR genes in humans evolve under different selection pressures than in other mammals. To explore this further, we compare the OR gene repertoire of human with its closest living evolutionary relative, by taking advantage of the recently sequenced genome of the chimpanzee. In agreement with previous reports based on a small number of ORs, we find that humans have a significantly higher proportion of OR pseudogenes than chimpanzees. Moreover, we can reject the possibility that humans have been accumulating OR pseudogenes at a constant neutral rate since the divergence of human and chimpanzee. The comparison of the two repertoires reveals two chimpanzee-specific OR subfamily expansions and three expansions specific to humans. It also suggests that a subset of OR genes are under positive selection in either the human or the chimpanzee lineage. Thus, although overall there is relaxed constraint on human olfaction relative to chimpanzee, species-specific sensory requirements appear to have shaped the evolution of the functional OR gene repertoires in both species. |
| DOI | 10.1101/gr.2846405 |
| Alternate Journal | Genome Res. |
| Citation Key | Gilad:OR:2005 |
| PubMed ID | 15687286 |
A comparison of the human and chimpanzee olfactory receptor gene repertoires.
Neandertals
For years, I've worked on their bones. Now I'm working on their genes. Read more about the science studying these ancient people.
Denisova
From a finger bone of an ancient human came the record of a completely unexpected population. My lab is working on the science of the Denisova genome.
Acceleration
The advent of agriculture caused natural selection to speed up greatly in humans. We're uncovering some of the ways that populations have rapidly changed during the last 10,000 years.
Malapa
Just outside Johannesburg, the Malapa site is producing some of the most exciting finds in human evolution. This site is the headquarters of the Malapa Soft Tissue Project.






