Flying rock skepticism
Flying rock skepticism
Anthropology.net reports on new work by François Paquay and colleagues that casts more doubt on the Younger Dryas impact event ("The Clovis comet that wasn't? Mystery deepens"). I wrote about another paper by Todd Surovell and colleagues earlier this fall ("The Younger Dryas impact fizzle?").
Why am I interested? There were several events during the Pleistocene that may have affected global climate -- the Toba volcano stands out, but there are others also. It is really difficult to test whether these events actually affected human populations, however -- the quality of evidence we have is very poor. But the Younger Dryas is recent enough that we have a lot more power to test the hypothesis that humans were affected by an impact.
Problem is, the geologists seem to disagree about whether an impact even happened!
I try to keep this in mind, when we see other reports (from a single event, or even a single core of lake sediments) that massive climate catastrophes must have decimated ancient human populations.







